Side by side · MY26 and MY24–MY25

BYD Atto 2vsMG ZS EV

345 km WLTP · 30 min 10–80%320 km WLTP · 37 min 10–80%
vs

The BYD Atto 2 is rated 345 km on the WLTP cycle, the MG ZS EV 320. A 10–80% stop takes 30 minutes in the BYD Atto 2 and 37 in the MG ZS EV. Every figure below names the badge it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.

At a glance

BYD Atto 2 · Dynamic

345km WLTP

30min 10–80%

A$31,990from

MG ZS EV · Excite

320km WLTP

37min 10–80%

A$39,990from

The short answer

The BYD Atto 2 turns the same electricity into more kilometres.

1

The BYD Atto 2 is rated 345 km against 320 — 25 km, 8% further. It uses 14.8 kWh to cover 100 km where the MG ZS EV needs 17.1.

2

A 10–80% stop takes 30 minutes in the BYD Atto 2 and 37 in the MG ZS EV. On a 50 kW post it is 43 and 43 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.

3

The BYD Atto 2 is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$31,990 against A$39,990 for the MG ZS EV — A$8,000 at the starting point, before on-road costs.

Which one, in one line

Pick the BYD Atto 2 ifit wins on range (345 km against 320), running cost (14.8 kWh per 100 km against 17.1), charging (30 minutes against 37).

The priceThe BYD Atto 2 is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$31,990; both are list prices before on-road costs and incentives.

MY26 · DynamicBYD Atto 2

BYD Atto 2

SUV/Crossover · 51.1 kWh · CCS2

WLTP range
345km
Efficiency
6.76km/kWh
DC peak
82kW
Boot
400L
MY24–MY25 · ExciteMG ZS EV

MG ZS EV

SUV/Crossover · 51 kWh · CCS2

WLTP range
320km
Efficiency
5.85km/kWh
DC peak
78kW
Boot
359L

Charging, raced

Two cars, one post, same clock

Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.

Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 72 kW for the BYD Atto 2, 58 kW for the MG ZS EV. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.

MG ZS EVCCS237min
BYD Atto 2CCS230min

At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 30 min in the BYD Atto 2 and 37 min in the MG ZS EV — a gap of 7 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger station would change nothing.

Every figure

The numbers, with the badge attached

A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per 100 km, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a taller body and a heavier car are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.

BYD Atto 2 and MG ZS EV, badges as the catalogue lists them. Sources: the Australian vehicle catalogue for every row, the directory for the tariffs behind the running cost.
MeasureBYD Atto 2MG ZS EV
Range and efficiency
WLTP range345 km✓MY26 Dynamic320 kmMY24–MY25 Excite
Efficiency6.76 km/kWh✓5.85 km/kWh
Energy per 100 km14.8 kWh✓17.1 kWh
Battery51.1 kWh51 kWh
Charging
DC peak82 kW✓78 kW
10–80% at peak30 min✓37 min
Average power, 10–80%(derived)72 kW✓58 kW
AC maximum7 kW7 kW
Fast-charge plugCCS2CCS2
AC plugType 2Type 2
Size and weight
Length4,310 mm4,323 mm
Width1,830 mm1,809 mm
Height1,675 mm1,625 mm
Kerb weight1,555 kg1,570 kg
Space and practicality
Seats55
Boot400 L✓359 L
Towing, braked—500 kg
Performance and warranty
Power130 kW130 kW
0–100 km/h7.9 s✓8.2 s
DriveFWDFWD
Battery warranty6yr unlimited km / 8yr unlimited km10yr 250,000km / 10yr 250,000km
Price
Starts atA$31,990✓list, before on-roadA$39,990list, before on-road
Dearest versionA$35,990✓A$41,990
Per km of WLTP rangeA$92.72/km✓cheapest versionA$124.97/kmcheapest version
Drive-awayA$33,760–A$36,500where the feed lists itA$42,000–A$44,500where the feed lists it

How to read the mixed rows. Range, efficiency, battery and charging come from one badge — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. The catalogue stores one record per badge, so where two figures come from different badges the row names the one it used.

What WLTP is not. It is a laboratory cycle at a fixed temperature, with the air conditioning off and a gentle acceleration profile. It exists so two cars can be compared on the same test, not so a driver can predict a highway run. Expect less on a 110 km/h trip, and less again in winter.

What this page does not claim. No ANCAP crash rating: the catalogue carries none, and a column of dashes would read like a failure rather than a gap. Prices are manufacturer list before on-road costs; the drive-away band appears only where the feed publishes one.

Your numbers

What this pair costs you, on your drive

Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.

The drive

Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the WLTP figure.

BYD Atto 2
4

stops · 120 min charging

MG ZS EV
4

stops · 148 min charging

The year

Energy at the wheels from the WLTP label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.

BYD Atto 2
A$1,110

A$7 per 100 km

MG ZS EV
A$1,283

A$9 per 100 km

The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.

Your priorities

A verdict you can argue with

There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.

Weighted result

BYD Atto 2

wins 6 of 6 measures on these weights

BYD Atto 2100%
MG ZS EV0%

Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.

Questions

Short answers, then the reasoning

Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.

Still unsure about a term? The connector guide covers the plugs, and the vehicle guide the rest.

Which has more range, the BYD Atto 2 or the MG ZS EV?

The BYD Atto 2. The BYD Atto 2 is rated 345 km and the MG ZS EV 320, each on the longest-range badge of its current model year — MY26 Dynamic and MY24–MY25 Excite respectively. WLTP is a laboratory cycle run at a fixed temperature with the air conditioning off, so treat the figure as a way to compare one car with another rather than a prediction for a highway run in summer.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Atto 2. Going from 10% to 80% takes 30 minutes in the BYD Atto 2 (82 kW peak) and 37 in the MG ZS EV (78 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.

Do they use the same plug?

Yes. Both list CCS2 for DC fast charging, so either car can use the same sites without an adapter. An adapter still cannot raise the power a car will accept.

Which is cheaper to run?

The BYD Atto 2, by about A$172.50 a year at 15,000 km and A$0.50 per kWh. It uses 14.8 kWh per 100 km against 17.1. That is energy only, at the wheels: session fees, idle fees and home-charger installation are not in it.

Which has more space?

The BYD Atto 2: 400 L of luggage space against 359 L. Makers measure boot volume by different conventions — some to the window line, some under the parcel shelf — so read the direction as reliable and the size of the gap as indicative.

Which is cheaper to buy?

The BYD Atto 2 is the cheaper of the two, listed from A$31,990 against A$39,990 for the MG ZS EV — A$8,000 between the two starting prices. Both are manufacturer list prices before on-road costs, options and any incentive, so a dealer's drive-away number will differ.

Other comparisons

All comparisons

Every figure on this page comes from the same records the BYD Atto 2 and MG ZS EV pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.