MY26 · Premium
Side by side · MY26 and MY25
BYD Atto 3 EvovsGeely EX5
510 km WLTP · 25 min 10–80%430 km WLTP · 30 min 10–80%
vs
The BYD Atto 3 Evo is rated 510 km on the WLTP cycle, the Geely EX5 430. A 10–80% stop takes 25 minutes in the BYD Atto 3 Evo and 30 in the Geely EX5. Every figure below names the badge it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.
At a glance
BYD Atto 3 Evo · Premium
510km WLTP
25min 10–80%
A$41,990from
Geely EX5 · Complete
430km WLTP
30min 10–80%
A$40,990from
The short answer
The BYD Atto 3 Evo goes further on a charge.
1
The BYD Atto 3 Evo is rated 510 km against 430 — 80 km, 19% further. It uses 16.4 kWh to cover 100 km where the Geely EX5 needs 15.8.
2
A 10–80% stop takes 25 minutes in the BYD Atto 3 Evo and 30 in the Geely EX5. On a 50 kW post it is 63 and 51 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.
3
The BYD Atto 3 Evo makes 230 kW against 160.
Which one, in one line
Pick the BYD Atto 3 Evo ifit wins on range (510 km against 430), charging (25 minutes against 30), space (490 L of boot against 410 L).
The priceThe Geely EX5 is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$40,990; both are list prices before on-road costs and incentives.
MY25 · Complete
Charging, raced
Two cars, one post, same clock
Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.
Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 126 kW for the BYD Atto 3 Evo, 84 kW for the Geely EX5. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.
Geely EX5CCS230min
BYD Atto 3 EvoCCS225min
At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 25 min in the BYD Atto 3 Evo and 30 min in the Geely EX5 — a gap of 5 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger station would change nothing.
Every figure
The numbers, with the badge attached
A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per 100 km, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a taller body and a heavier car are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.
| Measure | BYD Atto 3 Evo | Geely EX5 |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| WLTP range | 510 km✓MY26 Premium | 430 kmMY25 Complete |
| Efficiency | 6.1 km/kWh | 6.33 km/kWh✓ |
| Energy per 100 km | 16.4 kWh | 15.8 kWh✓ |
| Battery | 74.9 kWh | 60.2 kWh |
| Charging | ||
| DC peak | 220 kW✓ | 100 kW |
| 10–80% at peak | 25 min✓ | 30 min |
| Average power, 10–80%(derived) | 126 kW✓ | 84 kW |
| AC maximum | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Fast-charge plug | CCS2 | CCS2 |
| AC plug | Type 2 | Type 2 |
| Size and weight | ||
| Length | — | 4,615 mm |
| Width | — | 1,901 mm |
| Height | — | 1,670 mm |
| Kerb weight | — | 1,715 kg |
| Space and practicality | ||
| Seats | — | 5 |
| Boot | 490 L✓ | 410 L |
| Towing, braked | 1,500 kg | — |
| Performance and warranty | ||
| Power | 230 kW✓ | 160 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.5 s✓ | 6.9 s |
| Drive | RWD | FWD |
| Battery warranty | — | 7yr unlimited km / 8yr unlimited km |
| Price | ||
| Starts at | A$41,990list, before on-road | A$40,990✓list, before on-road |
| Dearest version | A$46,990 | A$44,990✓ |
| Per km of WLTP range | A$82.33/km✓cheapest version | A$95.33/kmcheapest version |
| Drive-away | A$48,900–A$50,700where the feed lists it | A$43,500–A$46,000where the feed lists it |
How to read the mixed rows. Range, efficiency, battery and charging come from one badge — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. The catalogue stores one record per badge, so where two figures come from different badges the row names the one it used.
What WLTP is not. It is a laboratory cycle at a fixed temperature, with the air conditioning off and a gentle acceleration profile. It exists so two cars can be compared on the same test, not so a driver can predict a highway run. Expect less on a 110 km/h trip, and less again in winter.
What this page does not claim. No ANCAP crash rating: the catalogue carries none, and a column of dashes would read like a failure rather than a gap. Prices are manufacturer list before on-road costs; the drive-away band appears only where the feed publishes one.
Your numbers
What this pair costs you, on your drive
Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.
The drive
Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the WLTP figure.
- BYD Atto 3 Evo
- 2
- Geely EX5
- 3
stops · 50 min charging
stops · 90 min charging
The year
Energy at the wheels from the WLTP label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.
- BYD Atto 3 Evo
- A$1,230
- Geely EX5
- A$1,185
A$8 per 100 km
A$8 per 100 km
The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.
Your priorities
A verdict you can argue with
There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.
Weighted result
BYD Atto 3 Evo
wins 4 of 6 measures on these weights
BYD Atto 3 Evo65%
Geely EX535%
Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.
Questions
Short answers, then the reasoning
Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.
Still unsure about a term? The connector guide covers the plugs, and the vehicle guide the rest.
Which has more range, the BYD Atto 3 Evo or the Geely EX5?
The BYD Atto 3 Evo. The BYD Atto 3 Evo is rated 510 km and the Geely EX5 430, each on the longest-range badge of its current model year — MY26 Premium and MY25 Complete respectively. WLTP is a laboratory cycle run at a fixed temperature with the air conditioning off, so treat the figure as a way to compare one car with another rather than a prediction for a highway run in summer.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Atto 3 Evo. Going from 10% to 80% takes 25 minutes in the BYD Atto 3 Evo (220 kW peak) and 30 in the Geely EX5 (100 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.
Do they use the same plug?
Yes. Both list CCS2 for DC fast charging, so either car can use the same sites without an adapter. An adapter still cannot raise the power a car will accept.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Geely EX5, by about A$45.00 a year at 15,000 km and A$0.50 per kWh. It uses 15.8 kWh per 100 km against 16.4. That is energy only, at the wheels: session fees, idle fees and home-charger installation are not in it.
Which has more space?
The BYD Atto 3 Evo: 490 L of luggage space against 410 L. Makers measure boot volume by different conventions — some to the window line, some under the parcel shelf — so read the direction as reliable and the size of the gap as indicative.
Which is cheaper to buy?
The Geely EX5 is the cheaper of the two, listed from A$40,990 against A$41,990 for the BYD Atto 3 Evo — A$1,000 between the two starting prices. Both are manufacturer list prices before on-road costs, options and any incentive, so a dealer's drive-away number will differ.
Other comparisons
All comparisonsSUV/CrossoverAlfa Romeo Junior vs Peugeot e-2008SUV/CrossoverAudi Q4 e-tron vs Mercedes-Benz EQBSUV/CrossoverAudi Q6 e-tron vs Polestar 4
Every figure on this page comes from the same records the BYD Atto 3 Evo and Geely EX5 pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.