
The Ford E-Transit Custom is rated 307 km on the WLTP cycle, the Peugeot e-Expert 330. A 10–80% stop takes 32 minutes in the Ford E-Transit Custom and 45 in the Peugeot e-Expert. Every figure below names the badge it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.
At a glance
Ford E-Transit Custom · Sport SWB
307km WLTP
32min 10–80%
A$73,990from
Peugeot e-Expert · Pro Long
330km WLTP
45min 10–80%
A$79,990from
The short answer
The Ford E-Transit Custom is the quicker car to charge.
The Peugeot e-Expert is rated 330 km against 307 — 23 km, 7% further. It uses 20.8 kWh to cover 100 km where the Peugeot e-Expert needs 22.7.
A 10–80% stop takes 32 minutes in the Ford E-Transit Custom and 45 in the Peugeot e-Expert. On a 50 kW post it is 54 and 63 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.
The Ford E-Transit Custom makes 160 kW against 100.
Which one, in one line
Pick the Ford E-Transit Custom ifit wins on running cost (20.8 kWh per 100 km against 22.7), charging (32 minutes against 45).
The priceThe Ford E-Transit Custom is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$73,990; both are list prices before on-road costs and incentives.


Charging, raced
Two cars, one post, same clock
Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.
Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 84 kW for the Ford E-Transit Custom, 70 kW for the Peugeot e-Expert. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.
At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 32 min in the Ford E-Transit Custom and 45 min in the Peugeot e-Expert — a gap of 13 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger station would change nothing.
Every figure
The numbers, with the badge attached
A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per 100 km, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a taller body and a heavier car are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.
| Measure | Ford E-Transit Custom | Peugeot e-Expert |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| WLTP range | 307 kmMY25–MY26 Sport SWB | 330 km✓MY24–MY26 Pro Long |
| Efficiency | 4.81 km/kWh✓ | 4.41 km/kWh |
| Energy per 100 km | 20.8 kWh✓ | 22.7 kWh |
| Battery | 64 kWh | 75 kWh |
| Charging | ||
| DC peak | 125 kW✓ | 100 kW |
| 10–80% at peak | 32 min✓ | 45 min |
| Average power, 10–80%(derived) | 84 kW✓ | 70 kW |
| AC maximum | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Fast-charge plug | CCS2 | CCS2 |
| AC plug | Type 2 | Type 2 |
| Size and weight | ||
| Length | 5,050 mm | 5,333 mm |
| Width | 2,032 mm | 1,920 mm |
| Height | 1,968 mm | 1,948 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,448 kg | 2,052 kg |
| Space and practicality | ||
| Seats | 6✓ | 2 |
| Boot | 5,800 L | 6,600 L✓ |
| Towing, braked | — | 1,000 kg |
| Performance and warranty | ||
| Power | 160 kW✓ | 100 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 9.5 s | — |
| Drive | RWD | FWD |
| Battery warranty | 5yr unlimited km / 8yr unlimited km | 5yr 200,000km / 8yr 160,000km |
| Price | ||
| Starts at | A$73,990✓list, before on-road | A$79,990list, before on-road |
| Dearest version | A$79,990 | A$79,990 |
| Per km of WLTP range | A$241.01/km✓cheapest version | A$242.39/kmcheapest version |
| Drive-away | A$83,500–A$87,500where the feed lists it | A$83,500–A$87,000where the feed lists it |
How to read the mixed rows. Range, efficiency, battery and charging come from one badge — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. The catalogue stores one record per badge, so where two figures come from different badges the row names the one it used.
What WLTP is not. It is a laboratory cycle at a fixed temperature, with the air conditioning off and a gentle acceleration profile. It exists so two cars can be compared on the same test, not so a driver can predict a highway run. Expect less on a 110 km/h trip, and less again in winter.
What this page does not claim. No ANCAP crash rating: the catalogue carries none, and a column of dashes would read like a failure rather than a gap. Prices are manufacturer list before on-road costs; the drive-away band appears only where the feed publishes one.
Your numbers
What this pair costs you, on your drive
Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.
The drive
Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the WLTP figure.
- Ford E-Transit Custom
- 5
- Peugeot e-Expert
- 4
stops · 160 min charging
stops · 180 min charging
The year
Energy at the wheels from the WLTP label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.
- Ford E-Transit Custom
- A$1,560
- Peugeot e-Expert
- A$1,703
A$10 per 100 km
A$11 per 100 km
The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.
Your priorities
A verdict you can argue with
There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.
Weighted result
Ford E-Transit Custom
wins 3 of 6 measures on these weights
Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.
Questions
Short answers, then the reasoning
Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.
Still unsure about a term? The connector guide covers the plugs, and the vehicle guide the rest.
Which has more range, the Ford E-Transit Custom or the Peugeot e-Expert?
The Peugeot e-Expert. The Ford E-Transit Custom is rated 307 km and the Peugeot e-Expert 330, each on the longest-range badge of its current model year — MY25–MY26 Sport SWB and MY24–MY26 Pro Long respectively. WLTP is a laboratory cycle run at a fixed temperature with the air conditioning off, so treat the figure as a way to compare one car with another rather than a prediction for a highway run in summer.
Which charges faster?
The Ford E-Transit Custom. Going from 10% to 80% takes 32 minutes in the Ford E-Transit Custom (125 kW peak) and 45 in the Peugeot e-Expert (100 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.
Do they use the same plug?
Yes. Both list CCS2 for DC fast charging, so either car can use the same sites without an adapter. An adapter still cannot raise the power a car will accept.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Ford E-Transit Custom, by about A$142.50 a year at 15,000 km and A$0.50 per kWh. It uses 20.8 kWh per 100 km against 22.7. That is energy only, at the wheels: session fees, idle fees and home-charger installation are not in it.
Which has more space?
The Peugeot e-Expert: 5,800 L of luggage space against 6,600 L, and 6 seats against 2. Makers measure boot volume by different conventions — some to the window line, some under the parcel shelf — so read the direction as reliable and the size of the gap as indicative.
Which is cheaper to buy?
The Ford E-Transit Custom is the cheaper of the two, listed from A$73,990 against A$79,990 for the Peugeot e-Expert — A$6,000 between the two starting prices. Both are manufacturer list prices before on-road costs, options and any incentive, so a dealer's drive-away number will differ.
Other comparisons
All comparisonsEvery figure on this page comes from the same records the Ford E-Transit Custom and Peugeot e-Expert pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.
