MY26 · Longitude
Side by side · MY26 and MY25–MY26
Jeep AvengervsPeugeot e-2008
396 km WLTP · 24 min 10–80%406 km WLTP · 30 min 10–80%
vs
The Jeep Avenger is rated 396 km on the WLTP cycle, the Peugeot e-2008 406. A 10–80% stop takes 24 minutes in the Jeep Avenger and 30 in the Peugeot e-2008. Every figure below names the badge it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.
At a glance
Jeep Avenger · Longitude
396km WLTP
24min 10–80%
A$49,990from
Peugeot e-2008 · GT
406km WLTP
30min 10–80%
A$45,980from
The short answer
The Peugeot e-2008 turns the same electricity into more kilometres.
1
The Peugeot e-2008 is rated 406 km against 396 — 10 km, 3% further. It uses 15.4 kWh to cover 100 km where the Peugeot e-2008 needs 13.3.
2
A 10–80% stop takes 24 minutes in the Jeep Avenger and 30 in the Peugeot e-2008. On a 50 kW post it is 45 and 45 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.
3
The Peugeot e-2008 lists 434 L of luggage space against 355 L.
Which one, in one line
Pick the Peugeot e-2008 ifit wins on range (406 km against 396), running cost (13.3 kWh per 100 km against 15.4), space (434 L of boot against 355 L).
The priceThe Peugeot e-2008 is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$45,980; both are list prices before on-road costs and incentives.
MY25–MY26 · GT
Charging, raced
Two cars, one post, same clock
Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.
Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 94 kW for the Jeep Avenger, 76 kW for the Peugeot e-2008. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.
Peugeot e-2008CCS230min
Jeep AvengerCCS224min
At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 24 min in the Jeep Avenger and 30 min in the Peugeot e-2008 — a gap of 6 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger station would change nothing.
Every figure
The numbers, with the badge attached
A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per 100 km, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a taller body and a heavier car are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.
| Measure | Jeep Avenger | Peugeot e-2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| WLTP range | 396 kmMY26 Longitude | 406 km✓MY25–MY26 GT |
| Efficiency | 6.49 km/kWh | 7.52 km/kWh✓ |
| Energy per 100 km | 15.4 kWh | 13.3 kWh✓ |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 54 kWh |
| Charging | ||
| DC peak | 100 kW | 100 kW |
| 10–80% at peak | 24 min✓ | 30 min |
| Average power, 10–80%(derived) | 94 kW✓ | 76 kW |
| AC maximum | 7 kW | 11 kW✓ |
| Fast-charge plug | CCS2 | CCS2 |
| AC plug | Type 2 | Type 2 |
| Size and weight | ||
| Length | 4,084 mm | 4,304 mm |
| Width | 1,776 mm | 1,770 mm |
| Height | 1,528 mm | 1,550 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,520 kg | 1,593 kg |
| Space and practicality | ||
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot | 355 L | 434 L✓ |
| Performance and warranty | ||
| Power | 115 kW | 115 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 9.0 s | 8.9 s✓ |
| Drive | FWD | FWD |
| Battery warranty | 5yr 100,000km / 8yr 160,000km battery | 5yr unlimited km / 8yr 160,000km battery |
| Price | ||
| Starts at | A$49,990list, before on-road | A$45,980✓list, before on-road |
| Dearest version | A$60,990 | A$45,980✓ |
| Per km of WLTP range | A$126.24/kmcheapest version | A$113.25/km✓cheapest version |
| Drive-away | A$40,000–A$53,500where the feed lists it | A$48,500–A$51,500where the feed lists it |
How to read the mixed rows. Range, efficiency, battery and charging come from one badge — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. The catalogue stores one record per badge, so where two figures come from different badges the row names the one it used.
What WLTP is not. It is a laboratory cycle at a fixed temperature, with the air conditioning off and a gentle acceleration profile. It exists so two cars can be compared on the same test, not so a driver can predict a highway run. Expect less on a 110 km/h trip, and less again in winter.
What this page does not claim. No ANCAP crash rating: the catalogue carries none, and a column of dashes would read like a failure rather than a gap. Prices are manufacturer list before on-road costs; the drive-away band appears only where the feed publishes one.
Your numbers
What this pair costs you, on your drive
Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.
The drive
Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the WLTP figure.
- Jeep Avenger
- 3
- Peugeot e-2008
- 3
stops · 72 min charging
stops · 90 min charging
The year
Energy at the wheels from the WLTP label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.
- Jeep Avenger
- A$1,155
- Peugeot e-2008
- A$998
A$8 per 100 km
A$7 per 100 km
The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.
Your priorities
A verdict you can argue with
There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.
Weighted result
Peugeot e-2008
wins 5 of 6 measures on these weights
Jeep Avenger21%
Peugeot e-200879%
Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.
Questions
Short answers, then the reasoning
Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.
Still unsure about a term? The connector guide covers the plugs, and the vehicle guide the rest.
Which has more range, the Jeep Avenger or the Peugeot e-2008?
The Peugeot e-2008. The Jeep Avenger is rated 396 km and the Peugeot e-2008 406, each on the longest-range badge of its current model year — MY26 Longitude and MY25–MY26 GT respectively. WLTP is a laboratory cycle run at a fixed temperature with the air conditioning off, so treat the figure as a way to compare one car with another rather than a prediction for a highway run in summer.
Which charges faster?
The Jeep Avenger. Going from 10% to 80% takes 24 minutes in the Jeep Avenger (100 kW peak) and 30 in the Peugeot e-2008 (100 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.
Do they use the same plug?
Yes. Both list CCS2 for DC fast charging, so either car can use the same sites without an adapter. An adapter still cannot raise the power a car will accept.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Peugeot e-2008, by about A$157.50 a year at 15,000 km and A$0.50 per kWh. It uses 13.3 kWh per 100 km against 15.4. That is energy only, at the wheels: session fees, idle fees and home-charger installation are not in it.
Which has more space?
The Peugeot e-2008: 355 L of luggage space against 434 L. Makers measure boot volume by different conventions — some to the window line, some under the parcel shelf — so read the direction as reliable and the size of the gap as indicative.
Which is cheaper to buy?
The Peugeot e-2008 is the cheaper of the two, listed from A$45,980 against A$49,990 for the Jeep Avenger — A$4,010 between the two starting prices. Both are manufacturer list prices before on-road costs, options and any incentive, so a dealer's drive-away number will differ.
Other comparisons
All comparisonsSUV/CrossoverAlfa Romeo Junior vs Peugeot e-2008SUV/CrossoverAudi Q4 e-tron vs Mercedes-Benz EQBSUV/CrossoverAudi Q6 e-tron vs Polestar 4
Every figure on this page comes from the same records the Jeep Avenger and Peugeot e-2008 pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.