MY23–MY26 · Pro Long
Side by side · MY23–MY26 and MY24–MY26
Peugeot e-PartnervsRenault Kangoo E-Tech
245 km WLTP · 30 min 10–80%285 km WLTP · 42 min 10–80%
vs
The Peugeot e-Partner is rated 245 km on the WLTP cycle, the Renault Kangoo E-Tech 285. A 10–80% stop takes 30 minutes in the Peugeot e-Partner and 42 in the Renault Kangoo E-Tech. Every figure below names the badge it belongs to, and the three tools further down turn the same numbers into a charging race, a road trip and a yearly bill.
At a glance
Peugeot e-Partner · Pro Long
245km WLTP
30min 10–80%
A$59,990from
Renault Kangoo E-Tech · SWB
285km WLTP
42min 10–80%
A$61,990from
The short answer
The Renault Kangoo E-Tech turns the same electricity into more kilometres.
1
The Renault Kangoo E-Tech is rated 285 km against 245 — 40 km, 16% further. It uses 20.4 kWh to cover 100 km where the Renault Kangoo E-Tech needs 15.8.
2
A 10–80% stop takes 30 minutes in the Peugeot e-Partner and 42 in the Renault Kangoo E-Tech. On a 50 kW post it is 42 and 38 minutes, so most of the advantage disappears at a slow site.
3
The Peugeot e-Partner lists 3,900 L of luggage space against 3,300 L.
Which one, in one line
Pick the Peugeot e-Partner ifit wins on charging (30 minutes against 42), space (3,900 L of boot against 3,300 L).
The priceThe Peugeot e-Partner is the cheaper to buy, listed from A$59,990; both are list prices before on-road costs and incentives.
MY24–MY26 · SWB
Charging, raced
Two cars, one post, same clock
Charging speed is a station number and a car number, and the smaller one wins. Set the post and both cars fill against the same clock — the interesting part is not who wins, it is how much of the gap a slow post takes away.
Each car is modelled on its own published 10–80% time, which gives an average power over that window: 70 kW for the Peugeot e-Partner, 45 kW for the Renault Kangoo E-Tech. A post above that average changes nothing; a post below it sets the pace.
Renault Kangoo E-TechCCS242min
Peugeot e-PartnerCCS230min
At 150 kW, going from 10% to 80% takes 30 min in the Peugeot e-Partner and 42 min in the Renault Kangoo E-Tech — a gap of 12 minutes. Both cars are limited by their own packs at this post, so a bigger station would change nothing.
Every figure
The numbers, with the badge attached
A tick marks a figure that is simply more useful — more range, less energy per 100 km, a faster stop. Rows without a tick are different, not better: a bigger battery, a taller body and a heavier car are all trades, and this page does not pretend otherwise.
| Measure | Peugeot e-Partner | Renault Kangoo E-Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| WLTP range | 245 kmMY23–MY26 Pro Long | 285 km✓MY24–MY26 SWB |
| Efficiency | 4.9 km/kWh | 6.33 km/kWh✓ |
| Energy per 100 km | 20.4 kWh | 15.8 kWh✓ |
| Battery | 50 kWh | 45 kWh |
| Charging | ||
| DC peak | 100 kW✓ | 80 kW |
| 10–80% at peak | 30 min✓ | 42 min |
| Average power, 10–80%(derived) | 70 kW✓ | 45 kW |
| AC maximum | 11 kW | 22 kW✓ |
| Fast-charge plug | CCS2 | CCS2 |
| AC plug | Type 2 | Type 2 |
| Size and weight | ||
| Length | 4,753 mm | 4,488 mm |
| Width | 1,848 mm | 1,859 mm |
| Height | 1,880 mm | 1,830 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,678 kg | 1,707 kg |
| Space and practicality | ||
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Boot | 3,900 L✓ | 3,300 L |
| Towing, braked | 750 kg | — |
| Performance and warranty | ||
| Power | 100 kW✓ | 90 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | — | 12.6 s |
| Drive | FWD | FWD |
| Battery warranty | 5yr 200,000km / 8yr 160,000km | 5yr 100,000km / 8yr 160,000km |
| Price | ||
| Starts at | A$59,990✓list, before on-road | A$61,990list, before on-road |
| Dearest version | A$59,990✓ | A$63,990 |
| Per km of WLTP range | A$244.86/kmcheapest version | A$217.51/km✓cheapest version |
| Drive-away | A$63,000–A$66,500where the feed lists it | A$64,874–A$69,000where the feed lists it |
How to read the mixed rows. Range, efficiency, battery and charging come from one badge — the longest-range version of each car's current model year, not the longest range it has ever been rated at. The catalogue stores one record per badge, so where two figures come from different badges the row names the one it used.
What WLTP is not. It is a laboratory cycle at a fixed temperature, with the air conditioning off and a gentle acceleration profile. It exists so two cars can be compared on the same test, not so a driver can predict a highway run. Expect less on a 110 km/h trip, and less again in winter.
What this page does not claim. No ANCAP crash rating: the catalogue carries none, and a column of dashes would read like a failure rather than a gap. Prices are manufacturer list before on-road costs; the drive-away band appears only where the feed publishes one.
Your numbers
What this pair costs you, on your drive
Two questions decide most purchases: how often you stop, and what the year costs. Both are arithmetic on the figures above, so change the inputs and the answer changes with you.
The drive
Starts full, arrives at 10%, charges back to 80% at each stop, and assumes a highway range of 85% of the WLTP figure.
- Peugeot e-Partner
- 6
- Renault Kangoo E-Tech
- 5
stops · 180 min charging
stops · 210 min charging
The year
Energy at the wheels from the WLTP label, priced at the tariff you pay. Home charging is usually cheaper than the directory's median.
- Peugeot e-Partner
- A$1,530
- Renault Kangoo E-Tech
- A$1,185
A$10 per 100 km
A$8 per 100 km
The trip model ignores charger detours, queueing and the last 10% of the pack, which is slow on both cars. The yearly cost is energy only: no session fees, no idle fees, no home-charger installation, and no petrol car to compare against.
Your priorities
A verdict you can argue with
There is no single winner, only a winner for a set of priorities. Move the sliders and the weighting changes — nothing here is a magazine score, and the page never hides the numbers it is built from.
Weighted result
Peugeot e-Partner
wins 4 of 6 measures on these weights
Peugeot e-Partner59%
Renault Kangoo E-Tech41%
Each measure is scaled between the two cars, so a weight of 5 means “this is the thing I care about” and 0 means “I do not care at all”. The scores are relative, not a rating out of ten.
Questions
Short answers, then the reasoning
Every figure here comes from the same data as the rest of the page. Where the data cannot answer, the page says so instead of guessing.
Still unsure about a term? The connector guide covers the plugs, and the vehicle guide the rest.
Which has more range, the Peugeot e-Partner or the Renault Kangoo E-Tech?
The Renault Kangoo E-Tech. The Peugeot e-Partner is rated 245 km and the Renault Kangoo E-Tech 285, each on the longest-range badge of its current model year — MY23–MY26 Pro Long and MY24–MY26 SWB respectively. WLTP is a laboratory cycle run at a fixed temperature with the air conditioning off, so treat the figure as a way to compare one car with another rather than a prediction for a highway run in summer.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot e-Partner. Going from 10% to 80% takes 30 minutes in the Peugeot e-Partner (100 kW peak) and 42 in the Renault Kangoo E-Tech (80 kW peak). At a slow post the station becomes the limit and the gap narrows, because the slower car is short of power rather than short of time.
Do they use the same plug?
Yes. Both list CCS2 for DC fast charging, so either car can use the same sites without an adapter. An adapter still cannot raise the power a car will accept.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault Kangoo E-Tech, by about A$345.00 a year at 15,000 km and A$0.50 per kWh. It uses 15.8 kWh per 100 km against 20.4. That is energy only, at the wheels: session fees, idle fees and home-charger installation are not in it.
Which has more space?
The Peugeot e-Partner: 3,900 L of luggage space against 3,300 L. Makers measure boot volume by different conventions — some to the window line, some under the parcel shelf — so read the direction as reliable and the size of the gap as indicative.
Which is cheaper to buy?
The Peugeot e-Partner is the cheaper of the two, listed from A$59,990 against A$61,990 for the Renault Kangoo E-Tech — A$2,000 between the two starting prices. Both are manufacturer list prices before on-road costs, options and any incentive, so a dealer's drive-away number will differ.
Other comparisons
All comparisonsEvery figure on this page comes from the same records the Peugeot e-Partner and Renault Kangoo E-Tech pages use. How the sources are chosen, and what a figure here never claims, is on the methodology page.